otherwise 1) In another way, differently; 2) Under other circumstances; 3) In other respects.

9Jun/094

Barking up the wrong tree?

In response to the hundreds of professors issuing public statements to protest against Lee Myung-bak's extremely unpopular regime, a conservative Seoul National University professor and literary critic, Kim Seong-konop-ed in The Korea's Herald.

Claiming that Lee Myung-bak is "stubborn and unwise maybe," but "far from a dictator," Kim laments that professors are wasting their time protesting against "their own government" instead of doing the right thing -- which, in his opinion, means one thing and one thing only: doing something about North Korea. Anything else is frivolous, really, since Korea's a thriving democracy (see evidence below).

196BC680-8F46-40C1-8080-2F172C2AFC26.jpg

January 20, 2009. Police fire water canons at protesters gathered, in sub-zero temperature no less, to mourn the death of 6 killed by overzealous and incompetent police acting on behalf of developers in Yongsan. Photo from here.

Wise Professor Kim also advises, "The times have changed. Today, one can freely join an anti-government protest without worrying about losing one's job or being arrested. This means that the professors who recently joined the protest are luckier than those of my generation. It also means that in such a democratized society as today's South Korea, you do not need to issue such a statement." And then he blames the Roh administration of creating the current ideological polarity.

Right. Because in a democratized society, one needs not protest.

Sure, LMB continues to crack down on the poor ("Korea highest in elderly poverty, OECD") and the displaced ("Yongsan tragedy") while exonerating crooked capitalists ("Samsung CEO found not guilty, surprise, surprise"), and lining the pockets of his construction buddies ("Four River Project folly").

Human rights film festivals are canceled without explanation, and even the basic right to public assembly is being threatened, but no. There's no need for pleas or protests.

All is swell, didn't you know?

  1. To give some context, I know Kim as a literary critic who bemoaned the low profile of Korean literature on world stage. You know, why Korea has never won a Nobel Prize in Literature. The way Kim saw it, Korean literature is not regarded highly because it's too hung up on "internal, psychological struggles" or "family conflicts" (perpetuated by none other than the women writers in the 1990s) or caught up in nationalism or political ideologies that simply do not appeal to a world audience. In short, Kim suggested that what Korea needs a Da Vinci Code, something apolitical, "universal" with "global appeal."

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tags: conservative, democracy, Korea/Diaspora, literature, politics, protest
8Jun/090

Concerned about Korean Democracy

Things are heating up in Korea. Again.

Over 1200 professors at six universities have urged Lee Myung-bak to wake up and smell the coffee -- including Korea University (LMB's alma mater!), Hanshin University (whose faculty promised to work towards a national referendum), Incheon University, SungKongHoe University, Sungkyunkwan University, and Woosuk University.

Seoul National University and Chung-ang University have already done one last week, and more are expected to follow.

In Seoul: Yonsei University, Kyung Hee University, Konkuk University, Dongguk University, Soongsil University, and the Korea National Open University (방송대).

Outside Seoul: Pusan National University, Changwon University, Chonbuk National University, Inha University, Kangwon National University, Kyungnam University.

BB1184C9-5FFF-471C-8275-4C038C036795.jpg

Chung-ang University professors read a statement concerned about the "death of democracy" in Korea. June 3, 2009 in The Hankyoreh

82A8E049-75D1-41CD-B952-093FB1411F23.jpg

Historian Chung Hyeon-baek represents Sungkyunkwan University professors. From Yonhap.

Over 300 law professors have already raised their concerns over the Supreme Court, and 281 historians are scheduled to issue a statement, as are 188 writers (many of them "young writers previously without political or activist affiliation"). Religious leaders are scheduled to speak up, too. 108 Buddhist leaders have raised criticisms of Lee Myung-bak administration's attacks against democracy, human rights and the environment, and has called for a public apology for how it handled the former President Roh Moo-hyun's investigation and death. Evangelical Christian leaders are scheduled to hold a meeting, but who knows what they'll say.

**

In the meantime, a group of scholars in North America have drafted the following statement to express concern about the present political situation in Korea. If you'd like to express your endorsement of the statement, please send your name and institutional affiliation to Korea.Democracy@gmail.com.

Statement from Scholars in North America Concerned about Korean Democracy

10 June 2009

The following represents the considered view of professors and researchers at colleges and universities throughout North America whose thoughts are always with Korea and Korea's democracy. In light of recent developments in South Korea, we, the undersigned, cannot but express grave concern. Nurtured by the toils and sacrifice of many, Korea's democracy is a proud asset of the Korean people. The world has watched as the Korean people have moved deliberately, with great determination and at great human cost, from dictatorship toward democracy, over the last six decades. Regrettably, since the inauguration of the President Lee Myung-bak administration, Korean democracy has lost its way.

A democracy must guarantee the freedoms of assembly and association, not only allowing the people to select their own representative through votes but also in order that they may express diverse political opinions. We have observed how the power of the state suppressed last year's "candlelight vigils," has issued subpoenas even to ordinary citizens who had participated in the protests, and is restricting the online exchange of ideas. The recent police blockade of Seoul Square is another egregious example of the government of President Lee Myung-bak denying the Korean people the most basic of democratic rights, the freedom to assemble.

A democracy acquires a capacity for self-regulation through the free press. We note with distress that the Public Prosecutor's Office has questioned journalists critical of the government, and the replacement of major broadcasting networks' executives with pro-government figures has infringed upon the professional autonomy of rank-and-file reporters. A foundation stone of a democracy, the free and independent press has suffered serious damage.

The Constitution of the Republic of Korea enshrines a system of checks-and-balances among the executive, the legislative, and the judicial branches of the government. We regretfully recognize and call attention to the fact that since its inauguration, the government has not upheld the principle of checks-and-balances. Moreover, the principle of justice through even and equal application of the law is under attack as can be evidenced through the arbitrary actions of such state organs as the Public Prosecutor's Office, the police, and the National Tax Service.

Speaking for North American scholars interested in the health and strength of democracy in Korea, we express deep concern over the regression of democracy in Korea. Heart-wrenching incidents such as the death of forced evictees during the police's suppression of their protest, the suicide of special contract workers, and the shocking decision by the former president to end his own life are all tragic consequences of a democracy that is taking backward steps in Korea; they highlight a democracy in crisis.

A democratically elected government cannot disparage its own people, because the mandate to govern derives from the people. We, the undersigned, urge the government of President Lee Myung-bak to recognize its responsibility for the democracy that has regressed and reorient itself as a government that respects the people's sovereignty and democratic rights. The nation's pride, the Korean democracy must again find its direction and return to the natural path of serving the people.

**

If you'd like to express your endorsement of the statement, please send your name and institutional affiliation to Korea.Democracy@gmail.com

Popularity: 2% [?]

Tags: democracy, Korea/Diaspora, petition, protest
7Jan/090

Majority & Democracy in the Korean National Assembly

The wise folks at Associated Press report:

World Briefing - Asia - South Korea - Opposition Party Ends Siege of National Assembly - NYTimes.com

Opposition lawmakers ended their violent, 12-day siege of South Korea’s Parliament on Tuesday after successfully delaying a crucial vote on a United States free-trade deal and other legislation. Democratic Party legislators had occupied the Parliament since Dec. 26, fending off security guards who tried to drag them out. They ended their sit-in after the Assembly speaker assured them that the governing party would not ram the bills through before the next American president took office. The parties agreed to hold the vote after President-elect Barack Obama’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

4DB0B2E5-8CD0-4B41-9F1A-23E7648AA8F5.jpgThis is SO not the whole story. And it's not just Korea's "feisty brand of democracy" as the New York Times condescendingly reports. What happened is this. It was the right-wing Grand National Party, the ruling party, that first tried to push through controversial legislation without the opposition party present -- by physically blockading them out of the National Assembly building. When the liberal opposition party tried to get in, they found themselves literally barricaded out, doors blocked with makeshift heaps of chairs and tables, effectively barring them from participating in debate or vote. A bunch of people got hurt and arrested, and the images of Korean politicians wrestling each other and the police got broadcast throughout the world as them "feisty" Koreans.

After that first debacle, the opposition party's assembly members snuck into the building over a weekend when nobody was there, and has been occupying the National Assembly to prevent the ruling party from shutting them out. In a way they're blocking the GNP from blocking them out.

Those guys in the photo above? They're actually trying to participate in the National Assembly committee meeting to discuss the contentious Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. They used crowbars and sledgehammers to try to get into the session, and this is what they got: fire extinguishers.

25D91ED8-4A8B-43C1-AE42-B9E9381DFC20.jpg

The latest is that the Democratic Party, the Liberty Forward Party, and the Renewal of Korea Party banded together to reach an accord with the Grand National Party (GNP), leaving behind the leftist Democratic Labor Party in the dust -- whose members (2, I think?) continued the "siege" until they were dragged out.

Why the physical scuffle? Because according to the Korean law, bills must be introduced by the Assembly speaker on the National Assembly floor, nowhere else, and called to a vote. Sounds reasonable, except that the GNP currently holds 172 seats in the 299-member legislature, while the second largest party, the Democratic Party, trailing with only 82 seats. In other words, the GNP has enough seats to be able to railroad anything it wants, and the opposition parties don't have the numbers to stop them.

So, the logical thing to do? Physically stop the Assembly speaker from introducing anything, that's what. Keep him out of the National Assembly, knock the microphone out of his hands, stage-dive to shove him off the podium, whatever it takes.

It goes the other way, too. The ruling parties have in the past assembled "secret" sessions in the middle of the night, just among themselves, introducing and passing all sorts of "emergency" legislations.

It's "majority rules" taken to an extreme.

Something's gotta change.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tags: democracy, Korea/Diaspora, national assembly, politics