Comic book about Yongsan redevelopment tragedy in 2009
This is a "book concert" for an awesome-looking comic book about the redevelopment policies in Seoul that killed 6 in January, 2009. The comic book artists and surviving families will be giving a talk.
I love the line drawings of the cityscape on the cover and this poster! On my list of books to acquire...

Popularity: 1% [?]
Tags: 2009, development, Korea/Diaspora, YongsanDaewoo wins major contract in Libya (again)
Following up the previous post on South Korea-Libya spy scandal, here's a little update in The China Post, August 7, 2010.
South Korea's Daewoo wins major Libyan project despite diplomatic row
SEOUL -- South Korea's Daewoo Engineering and Construction Co. said Friday it had won a major power plant project in Libya despite a row over alleged spying by Seoul. Daewoo on Thursday signed a contract in Libya with the state-run General Electricity Company of Libya to build a 750-megawatt power plant in Zwitina, some 140 km (87.5 miles) southwest of Benghazi, for US$438 million.
The project will start in November this year and is to be completed by May 2013, the company said. It is the fourth major power plant contract Daewoo has won in Libya since 2003.
Popularity: 4% [?]
Tags: development, Korea/Diaspora, LibyaKorea joins the Development Assistance Committee (DAC)
The Hankyoreh (here in Korean) reports that the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), a club of donor nations, has accepted South Korea as its 24th member. This makes South Korea a member of all 25 OECD committees, and the first time since the founding of the OECD in 1961 that a formerly aid-receiving nation has become a donor nation. The last time DAC accepted a new member was apparently in 1999, when Greece joined. Korea's membership is effective as of January 1, 2010.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT) said that the DAC member nations placed great significance at Wednesday’s meeting on the admission of South Korea as a nation that has gone from being an aid beneficiary to a donor.
원조 수혜국에서 원조 공여국으로 탈바꿈한 한국의 회원 가입에 큰 의미를 부여했다고 외교통상부는 밝혔다.
Sounds familiar, don't you think? From mission-receiving country to mission-sending country... And read this part:
Additionally, some 75 percent of all South Korean aid is tied aid, in which assistance is provided on the condition that it is accompanied by South Korean businesses and products, with the goals of expanded exports and resource development. Critics have said this form goes against the spirit of aid, in that it involves selecting areas for support according to South Korean interests rather than what is needed in the recipient nation.
MOFAT has announced plans to reduce the percentage of tied aid to 25 percent by 2015. It also said that it would increase efforts to promote the efficiency of aid, strengthen the link between concessional loans and grant aid, and pursue the enactment of a basic law on ODA.
한국은 원조를 하며 수출확대와 자원개발 등의 목적으로 한국 기업과 상품이 함께 따라가는 것을 조건으로 내거는 ‘구속성 원조’의 비율도 전체 원조의 75%에 이른다. 이는 받는 국가의 요구보다는 한국의 이해에 따라 지원분야를 선정하는 것으로, 원조의 취지에 맞지 않는다는 지적을 받아왔다.
외교부는 “2015년까지 구속성 원조의 비율을 25%로 낮출 계획”이라며 “원조 효율성 제고와 유·무상 원조간 연계 강화, 공적개발원조 기본법 제정 등의 노력을 기울여 나갈 것”이라고 밝혔다.
Here's a lovely graph that shows the last 10 years of ODA (official development assistance).

The line graph plots South Korea’s Official Development Aid (ODA)-GNI ratio over the past 9 years, while the lower bars shows ODA as US dollar amounts (millions).
Fascinating stuff. Now that my dissertation is finally wrapping up (very soon!) I'll have more time (hopefully) to read up on the connections between Korea's world evangelization enterprises and international development aid. I've so far focused on the cultural and discursive aspects of developmentalism, but especially given the extent of KOICA and development NGOs' collusion with evangelical Christian missions (see here), I don't think I can ignore development economics any longer.
Popularity: unranked [?]
Tags: development, Korea/Diaspora, OECDPolice & thugs working hand in hand in Yongsan
Following up on the Yongsan redevelopment tragedy. The Hankyoreh reports that the police armed security guards (a.k.a. thugs employed by developers) with sledgehammers and directed them to bring down the protesters in Yongsan.
No, it's not just some crazy rumor -- I saw the same reported on KBS news which played the radio transmissions which went, "With sledgehammers and other devices, the security guards will follow our unit and are preparing to remove the blockades on the third and fourth floors." The police had denied that it mobilized private security personnel, but the evidence clearly contradicts that lie.
The English editorial of The Hankyoreh offers this:
...the protesters decided to hold their protest as a result of having been chased out into the street in the middle of winter without even receiving their legally due compensation. For those involved, it was a matter of survival. If the government, far from acting as mediator, instead takes the side of the developers and carries out a suppression, it is impossible for this to be recognized as legitimate exercise of the law.
And ends with this:
This tragedy must be viewed as a disaster long ago foreseen within this kind of oppressive administration. But even worse incidents could occur if Cheong Wa Dae continues to ignore the pained voices of the people with the brazen attitude demonstrated in statements like “I hope this incident will mark the beginning of an end to the vicious cycle of extreme protests.” The government must immediately abandon its antagonistic policy toward the people. To start with, the right thing to do would be to place responsibility firmly on the drastic suppression measures, rather than evading responsibility on this matter and talking about “rebellious outside forces.”
It's a whole new awful stage of politics of dispossession in Korea, with the neoliberal state very much escalating its role in committing violence on behalf of capital. It's no surprise with a president who prides himself in the nickname, "bulldozer."
Popularity: 1% [?]
Tags: activism, development, Korea/Diaspora, LMB, protest, YongsanSix killed during redevelopment protest in Korea
Tragic, heartbreaking news from Seoul. You may have heard. One policeman and five activists occupying a building to protest redevelopment in the Yongsan area of Seoul were killed in a blaze caused by rash, overly aggressive, and downright stupid decision by the Seoul police agency to force the protest to end. Mind you, the 40 or so protesters had begun camping out just 25 hours ago, and they were obviously armed with Molotav cocktails.
Newly released documents reveal that the police chief was made aware of risks involved -- that police action may lead to injuries, suicides, and other potential damages to people and properties. The police were fully aware that there were gallons of paint thinners on the rooftop. The Seoul police chief Kim Seok-ki (hired just 2 days before the incident) nonetheless ordered a team of 100 police commandos to storm the building by landing on the roof in a shipping container lowered by a crane. Whose brilliant idea was this? Considering the visible resolve on the part of the protesters, the police's hasty and excessive tactics can only be interpreted as stupidity or arrogance at best, and murderous intent at worst.
And what's with the multi-purpose use of shipping containers these days? I mean, there are migrant workers and the urban poor living in converted shipping containers, a wall of shipping containers installed to block protesters, and now the police are using them as an idiot's version of a Trojan Horse?
TV news coverage showed protesters and their families on the ground looking up in horror as the building burst in fire engulfing their loved ones. One woman sobbed as she watched her husband and father die in the blaze. Another woman wailed as she clutched a lunch box she brought for her husband, now dead.
The LMB administration had recently vowed to crack down on violent and illegal protests, partly to unleash revenge against the anti-US beef candlelight protests that discredited and humiliated him last year and partly to use the recent scuffles at the National Assembly to penalize the opposition party (even though, like I posted earlier, the ruling party's own violent & undemocratic acts should not be forgotten in this discussion). It is likely that this case will also be used as part of the administration's crackdown against all dissent and protests, peaceful or otherwise. The National Evicted Tenants' Association will be hit especially hard for their involvement in the Yongsan case.
I'm not condoning the violent tactics used by the protesters. Given the militarized society that is South Korea, and given how certain militaristic tactics are regularly used by the left and the right alike, it is not entirely surprising to see confrontational protests like this. But protests of this intensity, involving Molotav cocktails rarely seen since the 80s, in Yongsan, and not by the "usual" suspects but by tenants and small business owners over redevelopment? This is highly unusual. Does this reflect more widespread despair and desperation?
This photo is befitting. It says, "Security State, Murderous State. Today is January 20, 1989." It's that bleak. It's that reminiscent of the authoritarian military-police state.

Considering the history of how these eviction and redevelopment protests have unfolded in Korea, it's no coincidence that evictions like this take place in the dead of winter. That's always been the favorite time for evictions. And it's likely that the escalating violence and the fires were instigated by the professional thugs hired by the developers and condoned by the police. Eyewitnesses confirm that the thugs had been taunting and harassing the protesters and families for days, and that they were seen numerous times trying to set fires.
All this focus on "violent protests" shouldn't take away from understanding the cause. All this madness surrounding "New Town" redevelopment and "Grand Canal" construction? Escalating violence inflicted by the neoliberal state acting with impunity. It's not just Lee Myung-bak. It's emblematic of the violent dispossessions enacted in the name of capitalist development.
***
Even the former president DJ shed a tear.
The elderly writer Cho Se-hui came out to the Yongsan site to make a statement. He's the author of the classic novel The Dwarf which was a heartbreaking story about urban redevelopment struggles in the 1970s. He's on the verge of tears with outrage, and his disbelief is palpable. He calls this incident nothing short of a massacre. This was the description of The Dwarf (new translation by Ju-Chan Fulton), and I think it's worth quoting in full:
The dark side of South Korea's "economic miracle" emerges in "The Dwarf", Cho Se-hui's enormously popular and critically acclaimed work. First published in 1978, it speaks to the painful social costs of reckless industrialization, even as it tellingly portrays the spiritual malaise of the newly rich and powerful and a working class subject to forces beyond its control. Cho's lean, clipped, deceptively simple style, the rapidly shifting points of view, terse dialogue, and subtle irony evoke the particularities of life in 1970s South Korea in the presence of global economic forces. The desperate realities of life for the dwarf, the proverbial little guy upon whose back Korea's economic transformation largely took place, are emotively rendered in twelve linked stories examining the lives of a laboring family, a family of the newly emerging middle class, and that of a wealthy industrialist. The stories have overlapping characters and situations: the murder of a swindler, a family's eviction from a squatter settlement, the assassination of an important executive, the dwarf's fantasy of a planet where life is easier, his later suicide and the subsequent fate of his dispersed friends and family members.
What Cho wrote in his author's preface to The Dwarf also rings true.
"When a revolution was needed, we didn't undergo a revolution. So we're unable to grow. Like so many nations in the Third World, our revolution was thwarted by small retreats and tiny reforms of the old regime. We are the witnesses."
Yesterday, Cho said in an interview:
Violence isn't just something that the military or the police commit. This day and age, if we stop a child from crying from hunger, that's violence. We didn't directly point the water hose and kill the evicted, but we're guilty of not preventing it. I'm just as guilty.
We're all guilty. We're all accountable.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Tags: development, Korea/Diaspora, LMB, protest










